Handling Dynamic Elements in Web Automation Testing

Modern web applications heavily rely on JavaScript for dynamic content loading. Elements might not be immediately available when the page loads, causing automation tests to fail if they interact with elements before they appear.

To handle this, waiting strategies are essential. In this blog, we will cover:
✅ Why waiting for elements is necessary
✅ Different types of waits in Selenium & Playwright
✅ Best practices for handling dynamic elements
✅ Code examples (Selenium & Playwright)
✅ Tools & GitHub repositories for advanced handling


🚀 Why Do We Need to Wait for Elements?

A test script may fail due to:
🔹 Asynchronous JavaScript execution – Elements load after the page
🔹 API response delays – Backend calls affect UI rendering
🔹 Animations & transitions – Buttons or modals may take time to appear
🔹 Lazy loading – Some elements load when scrolled into view

If you try to interact with an element before it’s available, Selenium or Playwright throws errors like:

 
selenium.common.exceptions.NoSuchElementException
playwright._impl._errors.TimeoutError

The solution? Use waits to pause execution until elements are ready.


⏳ Types of Waits in Automation Testing

There are three main types of waits used in automation frameworks:

Wait Type Description Use Case
Implicit Wait Waits for a defined time before throwing an error Applied globally, but may cause performance issues
Explicit Wait Waits until a specific condition is met before proceeding More efficient than implicit waits
Fluent Wait Similar to explicit wait but allows polling intervals Useful for handling dynamically appearing elements

🛠 1️⃣ Using Implicit Waits (Selenium & Playwright)

🔹 Selenium Example

from selenium import webdriver

driver = webdriver.Chrome()
driver.implicitly_wait(10)  # Waits up to 10 seconds for elements

driver.get("https://example.com")
element = driver.find_element("id", "dynamicElement")  # No explicit wait needed

driver.quit()

Pros: Simple to implement
Cons: Not efficient for waiting on specific elements

🔹 Playwright Example

 

from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright

with sync_playwright() as p:
    browser = p.chromium.launch()
    page = browser.new_page()
    page.set_default_timeout(10000)  # Set implicit timeout
    page.goto("https://example.com")
    page.locator("#dynamicElement").click()
    browser.close()

🎯 2️⃣ Using Explicit Waits (Better for Performance & Reliability)

🔹 Selenium Example

# Selenium
from selenium import webdriver
from selenium.webdriver.common.by import By
from selenium.webdriver.support.ui import WebDriverWait
from selenium.webdriver.support import expected_conditions as EC

driver = webdriver.Chrome()
driver.get("https://example.com")

# Wait for element to be visible
wait = WebDriverWait(driver, 10)
element = wait.until(EC.visibility_of_element_located((By.ID, "dynamicElement")))

element.click()
driver.quit()

Pros: Optimized, waits for specific conditions
Cons: Requires writing additional conditions

🔹 Playwright Example (Recommended)

from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright

with sync_playwright() as p:
    browser = p.chromium.launch()
    page = browser.new_page()
    page.goto("https://example.com")

    # Wait for element to be visible before clicking
    page.wait_for_selector("#dynamicElement", state="visible")
    page.locator("#dynamicElement").click()

    browser.close()

3️⃣ Fluent Waits (Polling Intervals for Unstable Elements)

🔹 Selenium Example

from selenium.webdriver.support.ui import WebDriverWait
from selenium.webdriver.support import expected_conditions as EC
from selenium.webdriver.common.by import By

wait = WebDriverWait(driver, 15, poll_frequency=0.5)  # Poll every 0.5s
element = wait.until(EC.element_to_be_clickable((By.ID, "dynamicElement")))
element.click()

Best For: Elements appearing at unpredictable intervals


📌 Best Practices for Waiting Strategies

Use explicit waits instead of implicit waits for efficiency
Avoid sleep() functions, as they waste execution time
Use polling intervals for more responsive tests
Use Playwright’s wait_for_selector instead of timeouts
Use Selenium’s expected_conditions for better stability


🚀 Advanced Handling: Waiting for AJAX & JavaScript Execution

Sometimes elements appear after an API request. You can wait for the network request to complete before interacting.

🔹 Playwright: Wait for API Response

with page.expect_response("**/api/getData") as response_info:
    page.locator("#submit").click()
response = response_info.value
print(response.status)

🔹 Selenium: Wait for JavaScript Execution

WebDriverWait(driver, 10).until(
    lambda d: d.execute_script("return document.readyState") == "complete"
)

Ensures all dynamic content has loaded before proceeding


📚 Further Reading & Resources

🔗 Popular Resources

🎯 Underrated Resources

📌 GitHub Repositories for Handling Dynamic Elements

🤖 AI-Powered Tools for Improving Web Testing

  • Testim – AI-based smart locators for handling dynamic elements
  • Applitools – AI-powered visual testing for web apps
  • LambdaTest – Cloud-based Selenium & Playwright testing

🎯 Conclusion

Dynamic elements can cause flaky tests if not handled properly. Using explicit waits, fluent waits, and JavaScript execution waits, we can ensure our automation scripts interact only with fully loaded elements.

Would you like to explore parallel execution strategies for handling dynamic tests next? 🚀

Search

Table of Contents

You may also like to read

AI Driven Test & Automation

Selenium